Fong et al v. Grenville-Germain Calgary Limited Partnership McLennan Ross acted when it comes to directors of the firm which constructed in a action commenced with respect to the people who own the domestic condominiums for misrepresentations and inadequacies.
Hudyma v. LoyaltyOne, Inc. et al McLennan Ross acted for an transportation that is international pertaining to an action involving a sizable travel facilitator plus the incorporation of gas surcharges within the calculation of expenses.
Kilroy v. A payday that is ok loans et al it was A uk Columbia course action against lots of cash advance operations, by which McLennan Ross represented three associated with the Defendants. The Plaintiff discontinued its action against our consumers. Korte v. Cormie McLennan Ross ended up being counsel towards the auditors in this course of action, a в??representative proceedingв?? ahead of the implementation of class procedures legislation in Alberta, that was brought on behalf of most of the investors in 2 subsidiaries regarding the Principal Group, an economic conglomerate that failed. The problem ended up being settled just before exams for development.
Lahaie v. Goodyear this is a course action against Goodyear. McLennan Ross assisted as Alberta counsel in commencing the course action in Alberta during the request of British Columbia counsel, who’d currently commenced an action in British Columbia. The problem had been settled in British Columbia.
MacKinnon v. National cash Mart et al This course action had been brought in British Columbia contrary to the major operators when you look at the pay day loan industry. McLennan Ross had been counsel to 1 associated with the Defendants. We had been effective in opposing a credit card applicatoin for official official certification, following that the Plaintiff discontinued this step as against our customers.
Nette v. Stiles et al In this proposed course action, the Plaintiff claimed from the Alberta national together with College of Chiropractors that one therapy ended up being harmful and really should never be allowed into the Province of Alberta. McLennan Ross represented a Defendant and brought a credit card applicatoin to really have the claim dismissed just before certification. The Plaintiff discontinued against our customer prior to the application had been argued.
O’Keefe v. Menu Foods working Limited Partnership McLennan Ross had been associated with a course action brought by owners alleging this one regarding the major suppliers of pet meals in Alberta didn’t have quality settings set up which lead to the loss of home animals from tainted meals. This litigation had been solved by settlement between the events.
Pauli et al v. Ace INA Insurance et al McLennan Ross acted as Alberta counsel for just one associated with the Defendants in this course of action which desired try this web-site an interpretation associated with the Insurance Act and a return of every deductible charged where there is a loss that is total of at issue. The action ended up being settled in preference of the Defendants after a synopsis determination of the point of legislation. Ramias v. Johnson McLennan Ross ended up being counsel towards the Plaintiffs in this class that is putative which advertised investment fraud and securities violations. It absolutely was discontinued after settlement using the Defendants.
Tschritter v. Instaloans Financial Systems Centres McLennan Ross had been counsel to your Defendants in this class action brought against a payday financial institution in the Province of Alberta, that has been fixed included in the overall settlement associated with Ontario and Alberta course procedures against our consumers (see Bruley and Downey above).
Western Canada Buying Centres v. Dutton McLennan Ross acted for example for the defendants in this class that is longstanding for many years.
Bank of America et al Class actions have already been filed against Visa, MasterCard, and an amount of finance institutions in British Columbia, Alberta, Quebec and Ontario, claiming losings on the part of Canadian merchants who accepted re payment for products or solutions by means of Visa or MasterCard charge cards linked to solution costs and limitations on company techniques which were needed to be able to accept payments that are such. McLennan Ross will act as Alberta representative for counsel for starters associated with the Defendant finance institutions. The things are susceptible to coordinated situation administration and therefore are ongoing.